Axiomatisations is an English word. Below you'll find 2 example sentences showing how it's used in practice.
Axiomatisations meaning
plural of axiomatisation
Using Axiomatisations
- The main meaning on this page is: plural of axiomatisation
Context around Axiomatisations
- Average sentence length in these examples: 28 words
- Position in the sentence: 1 start, 0 middle, 1 end
- Sentence types: 2 statements, 0 questions, 0 exclamations
Corpus analysis for Axiomatisations
- In this selection, "axiomatisations" usually appears near the start of the sentence. The average example has 28 words, and this corpus slice is mostly made up of statements.
- Around the word, known and alternative stand out and add context to how "axiomatisations" is used.
- Recognizable usage signals include some alternative axiomatisations of set and well known axiomatisations will do. That gives this page its own corpus information beyond isolated example sentences.
- By corpus frequency, "axiomatisations" sits close to words such as aabb, aabria and aacha, which helps place it inside the broader word index.
Example types with axiomatisations
The same corpus examples are grouped by length and sentence type, making it easier to see the contexts in which the word appears:
In the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, there are no ur-elements, but they are included in some alternative axiomatisations of set theory. (21 words)
Any of the several well-known axiomatisations will do; we assume without proof all the basic well-known results about our formalism (such as the normal form theorem or the soundness theorem ) that we need. (35 words)
Any of the several well-known axiomatisations will do; we assume without proof all the basic well-known results about our formalism (such as the normal form theorem or the soundness theorem ) that we need. (35 words)
In the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, there are no ur-elements, but they are included in some alternative axiomatisations of set theory. (21 words)
Example sentences (2)
Any of the several well-known axiomatisations will do; we assume without proof all the basic well-known results about our formalism (such as the normal form theorem or the soundness theorem ) that we need.
In the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, there are no ur-elements, but they are included in some alternative axiomatisations of set theory.