Decisional

Third, is what the privacy scholar Daniel Solove of George Washington University Law School calls “decisional interference”—the government’s incursion into the data subject’s personal decisions.

Decisional independence is the idea that judges should be able to decide cases solely based on the law and facts, without letting the media, politics or other concerns sway their decisions, and without fearing penalty in their careers for their decisions.

They base their choices on objective criteria rather than power, pressure, self-interest, or an arbitrary decisional procedure.