Explore Emotivists through 2 example sentences from English, with an explanation of the meaning. Ideal for language learners, writers and word enthusiasts.
Emotivists in a sentence
Emotivists meaning
plural of emotivist
Using Emotivists
- The main meaning on this page is: plural of emotivist
Context around Emotivists
- Average sentence length in these examples: 25.5 words
- Position in the sentence: 2 start, 0 middle, 0 end
- Sentence types: 2 statements, 0 questions, 0 exclamations
Corpus analysis for Emotivists
- In this selection, "emotivists" usually appears near the start of the sentence. The average example has 25.5 words, and this corpus slice is mostly made up of statements.
- Around the word, ask and think stand out and add context to how "emotivists" is used.
- Recognizable usage signals include emotivists ask whether and emotivists think not. That gives this page its own corpus information beyond isolated example sentences.
- By corpus frequency, "emotivists" sits close to words such as aabb, aabria and aacha, which helps place it inside the broader word index.
Example types with emotivists
The same corpus examples are grouped by length and sentence type, making it easier to see the contexts in which the word appears:
Emotivists ask whether there really is evidence that killing is wrong. (11 words)
Emotivists think not, claiming that we do not need to postulate the existence of moral "badness" or "wrongness" to explain why considering certain deeds makes us feel disapproval; that all we really observe when we introspect are feelings of disapproval. (40 words)
Emotivists think not, claiming that we do not need to postulate the existence of moral "badness" or "wrongness" to explain why considering certain deeds makes us feel disapproval; that all we really observe when we introspect are feelings of disapproval. (40 words)
Emotivists ask whether there really is evidence that killing is wrong. (11 words)
Example sentences (2)
Emotivists ask whether there really is evidence that killing is wrong.
Emotivists think not, claiming that we do not need to postulate the existence of moral "badness" or "wrongness" to explain why considering certain deeds makes us feel disapproval; that all we really observe when we introspect are feelings of disapproval.