Ndaa in a sentence

Another measure that made it into the NDAA draft bill is Romney’s Chemical and Biological Defense Program Improvement Act, which would allow the Army to fund chem-bio program facilities without any bureaucratic roadblocks.

Following the success of the 2021 local and parliamentary elections and a trip by Bihi to Washington, DC, US Congress amended the National Defense Authorisation Act (NDAA), which specifies the annual budget of its Department of Defense.

Fortunately, my legislation to ban this technology was included in the final 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

If McCarthy loses the support of the Democrats, the speaker will need every GOP vote in favor to pass the NDAA.

The Act would repeal Sec. 913 of the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which codified the appointment of those positions into law.

The NDAA has passed Congress for sixty-one consecutive years.

The version of the NDAA signed by Biden represents a compromise between the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and the Democratic-led Senate, which disagreed over the inclusion of several conservative policy measures by House Republicans.

What’s the prospect of that, given that there is a compromise bill on the NDAA?

With the passing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) by the U.S. Congress in December, which embedded elements of the Burma Act, the United States has signaled its commitment to supporting the people’s struggle against military dictatorship.

And does the NDAA seem to address the issue of the fact that some rearmament is really necessary if it can be done in some reasonable fashion?

A recent proposal to the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) – the military budget – seeks to force the Air Force to buy more F-15EX Eagle II fighter jets and prevent the production line from closing too early.

Durbin, the Senate Majority Whip, on Monday that he wants to offer his credit card bill, the Credit Card Competition Act, as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a must-pass defense bill.

During our work on this year’s NDAA, Senator Budd has been a vital legislative contributor by directing the right investments to deter China’s growing aerospace threat.

In April 2014, the DOJ successfully persuaded the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss a lawsuit – Hedges v. Obama – challenging the constitutionality of a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

The NDAA is an annual piece of legislation that sets the budget for the Pentagon.

The NDAA passed by the House Republicans demands that they do better than that.

Any chance, or is there any connection between those and what might end up in the NDAA with respect to the procurement reform that they usually put in there?

The bill, known as the National Defense Authorisation Act, or NDAA, contains a 3 per cent pay rise for US troops, and authorises more than $740bn in military programmes and construction.

The bipartisan, bicameral NDAA bill has been passed 59 years in a row.

The government did not reassess the MFP construct until decades later,when the ommission to Assess United States National Security, Space Management—established in the 2000 NDAA—recommended the creation of an MFP for space.