Get to know Recalculations better with 2 real example sentences, the meaning.
Recalculations meaning
plural of recalculation
Using Recalculations
- The main meaning on this page is: plural of recalculation
Context around Recalculations
- Average sentence length in these examples: 24 words
- Position in the sentence: 1 start, 1 middle, 0 end
- Sentence types: 2 statements, 0 questions, 0 exclamations
Corpus analysis for Recalculations
- In this selection, "recalculations" usually appears near the start of the sentence. The average example has 24 words, and this corpus slice is mostly made up of statements.
- Recognizable usage signals include calculations and recalculations which allows and later recalculations by others. That gives this page its own corpus information beyond isolated example sentences.
- By corpus frequency, "recalculations" sits close to words such as aabb, aabria and aacha, which helps place it inside the broader word index.
Example types with recalculations
The same corpus examples are grouped by length and sentence type, making it easier to see the contexts in which the word appears:
Later recalculations by others gave values of 4.77 and 4.95, illustrating the uncertainties in these geographical methods. (19 words)
Frankston described VisiCalc as a "magic sheet of paper that can perform calculations and recalculations", which "allows the user to just solve the problem using familiar tools and concepts". (29 words)
Frankston described VisiCalc as a "magic sheet of paper that can perform calculations and recalculations", which "allows the user to just solve the problem using familiar tools and concepts". (29 words)
Later recalculations by others gave values of 4.77 and 4.95, illustrating the uncertainties in these geographical methods. (19 words)
Example sentences (2)
Frankston described VisiCalc as a "magic sheet of paper that can perform calculations and recalculations", which "allows the user to just solve the problem using familiar tools and concepts".
Later recalculations by others gave values of 4.77 and 4.95, illustrating the uncertainties in these geographical methods.