On this page you'll find 2 example sentences with Spamarrest. Discover how to use the word correctly in a sentence.
Spamarrest in a sentence
Context around Spamarrest
- Average sentence length in these examples: 30 words
- Position in the sentence: 2 start, 0 middle, 0 end
- Sentence types: 2 statements, 0 questions, 0 exclamations
Corpus analysis for Spamarrest
- In this selection, "spamarrest" usually appears near the start of the sentence. The average example has 30 words, and this corpus slice is mostly made up of statements.
- Around the word, hormel stand out and add context to how "spamarrest" is used.
- Recognizable usage signals include argued that spamarrest s use and foods v spamarrest hormel attempted. That gives this page its own corpus information beyond isolated example sentences.
- By corpus frequency, "spamarrest" sits close to words such as aabc, aacr and aacsb, which helps place it inside the broader word index.
Example types with spamarrest
The same corpus examples are grouped by length and sentence type, making it easier to see the contexts in which the word appears:
In Hormel Foods v. SpamArrest, Hormel attempted to assert its trademark rights against SpamArrest, a software company, from using the mark "spam", since Hormel owns the trademark. (27 words)
In a dilution claim, Hormel argued that SpamArrest's use of the term "spam" had endangered and damaged "substantial goodwill and good reputation" in connection with its trademarked lunch meat and related products. (33 words)
In a dilution claim, Hormel argued that SpamArrest's use of the term "spam" had endangered and damaged "substantial goodwill and good reputation" in connection with its trademarked lunch meat and related products. (33 words)
In Hormel Foods v. SpamArrest, Hormel attempted to assert its trademark rights against SpamArrest, a software company, from using the mark "spam", since Hormel owns the trademark. (27 words)
Example sentences (2)
In Hormel Foods v. SpamArrest, Hormel attempted to assert its trademark rights against SpamArrest, a software company, from using the mark "spam", since Hormel owns the trademark.
In a dilution claim, Hormel argued that SpamArrest's use of the term "spam" had endangered and damaged "substantial goodwill and good reputation" in connection with its trademarked lunch meat and related products.